This article continues the discussion of the "truth within" concept as it relates to the family. Listed below is the definition of the idea:
"The idea that the truth lies within each individual is a powerful concept. It means that each individual contains an element of the truth that makes them unique and important. It also demands that each and every person be given a voice and be heard for the whole truth to be understood. Each person contributes a piece and the whole truth cannot be trusted until it can contain the ideas of each and every person involved."
If we apply this concept to the family, it means that there is some truth in the reactions of all family members. This is true from the smallest child to the eldest member, true for a teenager as well as a parent, true for a grandparent as well as an aunt or uncle. The truth is not the sole possession of the parents, but is trusted to the relationships among all the family members. The mutual search for the truth does not mean that the parent abandon their responsibilities to set rules and boundaries for the children and do whatever the child wants. It means that there is an honest process between the parents to do what is reasonable, and to include the child's opinion in determining their final decision. All family members are equal in value but not equal in obligation or role. However, the process of arriving at a decision, if it honors the truth concept, is carried out in way that enables each person to be heard, and their opinion addressed. It is not dismissed as meaningless because it comes "out of the mouth of babes." Decisions are not made hastily or arbitrarily. They are made between the parents after discussion with the children to get their input. Dialogue is encouraged and the value of opinions and perceptions is validated.
This concept is radically different from the traditional view of the proper role of the child within the family. Obedience rather than truth is given the highest value in the traditional family. Children are considered good if they " do as they are told." Encouraging children to voice their opinion is seen as breeding anarchy and no respect for authority. Getting the opinion of a child is viewed as confusing the child and condoning breaking the rules. Good behavior is the goal regardless of why the child is being good.
If the family properly applies the truth concept, then the children raised in that environment will have less anxiety than children raised in a more traditional setting. Reasonable rules will prevail, with the weaknesses of each parent buffered by the input of all members. The reactions of the Natural Self will be consistent with the Family Self, reducing the anxiety that occurs as a result of the internal clash between the two systems.
Saturday, March 5, 2011
Friday, March 4, 2011
THE TRUTH WITHIN: THE MARRIAGE
I discussed the idea of the "truth within" as a core concept in understanding human behavior. The basic idea bears repeating before we talk about the application of the idea to a healthy marriage:
"The idea that the truth lies within each individual is a powerful concept. It means that each individual contains an element of the truth that makes them unique and important. It also demands that each and every person be given a voice and be heard for the whole truth to be understood. Each person contributes a piece and the whole truth cannot be trusted until it can contain the ideas of each and every person involved."
Healthy relationships, marriage and friendship alike, are based on trust. Trust is established by treating the other person with respect, honoring the need for emotional honesty, and validating their worth by valuing their opinion and perceptions. Another way to say this is that you honor the truth within that person, including when differences of perception or opinion arise. Differences are resolved by a mutual search for the truth, with the recognition that both parties position reflect a part of the truth. The integration of the competing ideas through negotiation and compromise mutually validate each person, and enhance the trust between them.
The opposite is also true. Relationships are damaged throughdiscounting the other person's position. The phrase, "That is your perception" is one such form of discounting . While on the surface it seems to recognize the individual's position, on a deeper level it acts to discount the truth in that perception. There is no further discussion to find the why or the what of the position that would truly reflect the desire to understand. The comment ends the discussion. Beginning a response with the word "No...." or worse, "Your wrong..." is another example of discounting. No or wrong implies no value to their opinion nor any interest in understanding how they arrived at that opinion or perception. There is only room for one opinion, rather than making room for both opinions.
In a healthy marriage, there is mutual validation occurring on a daily basis. Each partner helps the other to find the Real Self and separate from the Family Self. They dialogue openly about their own emotional reactions, and the confusion that is created within. They point out their partner's reactions and ask for an explanation. They see what their spouse cannot see. They validate the right to be angry and give permission to feelings that can be suppressed due to fear. They help the other to sort through the reactions to find which one represents their Real Self.
When discussing marriage, the issue always arises about the fear of losing oneself in the marriage. Men often use the term "whipped" to imply that the man's fear of his wife's anger makes him surrender his wants and needs to her desires. In a healthy marriage, nobody surrenders. Your spouse helps you to honor your Real Self and not get lost in the fears, guilt and shame of the Family Self. Rather than lose yourself, you help to find and preserve your Real Self. Your partner becomes your closest confidant and supporter, your best friend.The Real Self is preserved rather than lost.
"The idea that the truth lies within each individual is a powerful concept. It means that each individual contains an element of the truth that makes them unique and important. It also demands that each and every person be given a voice and be heard for the whole truth to be understood. Each person contributes a piece and the whole truth cannot be trusted until it can contain the ideas of each and every person involved."
Healthy relationships, marriage and friendship alike, are based on trust. Trust is established by treating the other person with respect, honoring the need for emotional honesty, and validating their worth by valuing their opinion and perceptions. Another way to say this is that you honor the truth within that person, including when differences of perception or opinion arise. Differences are resolved by a mutual search for the truth, with the recognition that both parties position reflect a part of the truth. The integration of the competing ideas through negotiation and compromise mutually validate each person, and enhance the trust between them.
The opposite is also true. Relationships are damaged through
In a healthy marriage, there is mutual validation occurring on a daily basis. Each partner helps the other to find the Real Self and separate from the Family Self. They dialogue openly about their own emotional reactions, and the confusion that is created within. They point out their partner's reactions and ask for an explanation. They see what their spouse cannot see. They validate the right to be angry and give permission to feelings that can be suppressed due to fear. They help the other to sort through the reactions to find which one represents their Real Self.
When discussing marriage, the issue always arises about the fear of losing oneself in the marriage. Men often use the term "whipped" to imply that the man's fear of his wife's anger makes him surrender his wants and needs to her desires. In a healthy marriage, nobody surrenders. Your spouse helps you to honor your Real Self and not get lost in the fears, guilt and shame of the Family Self. Rather than lose yourself, you help to find and preserve your Real Self. Your partner becomes your closest confidant and supporter, your best friend.The Real Self is preserved rather than lost.
Thursday, March 3, 2011
THE TRUTH WITHIN: THE SELF
The idea that the truth lies within each individual is a powerful concept. It means that each individual contains an element of the truth that makes them unique and important. It also demands that each and every person be given a voice and be heard for the whole truth to be understood. Each person contributes a piece and the whole truth cannot be trusted until it can contain the ideas of each and every person involved.
This idea forms the basis for the Real Self, a healthy marriage and a healthy family. I will address the impact of the" truth within" on the self in this section, and discuss the significance for a healthy marriage and family in subsequent articles. As a small child, the self is formed around pleasing the parents. Parents are the source of comfort, safety, and education. This training is imprinted in our emotional responses. Fear, guilt and shame register when we break the rules upon which we were raised. Because we are all raised by imperfect people with imperfect relationships, we are raised with imperfect rules, with truths that are not true. This is the basis for the Family Self. These imperfections register in the child and are challenged by the sense of internal truth in the child, the basic feeling of good or bad. This truth forms the basis for the Real Self. When the way we are treated feels bad, it is bad, even if another, including our parents, tells us different. We know that from the truth within us. This truth is protected by our natural primary emotions. Natural anger and sadness registers the clash between our internal truth and the way we are being raised. It tells us that a threat exists to hide the truth.
When we are faced with a situation or event, we react with our thoughts and feelings. Most of the time, there is no conflict between the information sent by the Real Self and the Natural Self. We feel our primary emotions of joy, sadness and anger and we think about an event a certain way that reflects these feelings. Our feelings trigger our thoughts and color our perceptions. When there is a clash between what we naturally want to do and what we have been taught to do, anxiety is triggered. The emotions that reflect the Real Self's truth and the emotions from the Family Self that reflect the world according to mom and dad compete to determine what we will do. In a nutshell, the battle reduces to a conflict between anger/sadness against guilt/shame. Anger becomes our protection and guilt/shame become the "enemy within".
There are two issues that interfere with our insight into our deeper emotions. For one, we are typically unaware of our deeper emotions and focus on our thoughts. We think about events and relationships, and talk to ourselves all day long but rarely have insight into the emotions that drive the thoughts. Secondly, we become confused about the origins of our emotions because they all exist within in and are incorrectly believed to reflect us. Without training, we fail to label those reactions that reflect the imprint of our family upbringing. We don't even begin the search because we automatically believe what we feel to be true and aren't used to discerning our emotions and identifying the source to decide the truth.
This idea forms the basis for the Real Self, a healthy marriage and a healthy family. I will address the impact of the" truth within" on the self in this section, and discuss the significance for a healthy marriage and family in subsequent articles. As a small child, the self is formed around pleasing the parents. Parents are the source of comfort, safety, and education. This training is imprinted in our emotional responses. Fear, guilt and shame register when we break the rules upon which we were raised. Because we are all raised by imperfect people with imperfect relationships, we are raised with imperfect rules, with truths that are not true. This is the basis for the Family Self. These imperfections register in the child and are challenged by the sense of internal truth in the child, the basic feeling of good or bad. This truth forms the basis for the Real Self. When the way we are treated feels bad, it is bad, even if another, including our parents, tells us different. We know that from the truth within us. This truth is protected by our natural primary emotions. Natural anger and sadness registers the clash between our internal truth and the way we are being raised. It tells us that a threat exists to hide the truth.
When we are faced with a situation or event, we react with our thoughts and feelings. Most of the time, there is no conflict between the information sent by the Real Self and the Natural Self. We feel our primary emotions of joy, sadness and anger and we think about an event a certain way that reflects these feelings. Our feelings trigger our thoughts and color our perceptions. When there is a clash between what we naturally want to do and what we have been taught to do, anxiety is triggered. The emotions that reflect the Real Self's truth and the emotions from the Family Self that reflect the world according to mom and dad compete to determine what we will do. In a nutshell, the battle reduces to a conflict between anger/sadness against guilt/shame. Anger becomes our protection and guilt/shame become the "enemy within".
There are two issues that interfere with our insight into our deeper emotions. For one, we are typically unaware of our deeper emotions and focus on our thoughts. We think about events and relationships, and talk to ourselves all day long but rarely have insight into the emotions that drive the thoughts. Secondly, we become confused about the origins of our emotions because they all exist within in and are incorrectly believed to reflect us. Without training, we fail to label those reactions that reflect the imprint of our family upbringing. We don't even begin the search because we automatically believe what we feel to be true and aren't used to discerning our emotions and identifying the source to decide the truth.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
CHANGING
Change is a confusing topic. On the one hand, people will say that you should not try to change others but accept them as they are. On the other hand, you hear people refer to "the work" of marriage and the need to learn and grow together. The answer is to focus on yourself and to get distance from unhealthy people who promote denial. One issue is clear. You are responsible for your own change process. For example, if you don't like the way you are treated by family or friends, you need to tell them for several reasons. The first and best reason to speak up is to represent yourself. It is not to change the other person. Some change will occur if you speak your mind. First you are changing because you are choosing to have a voice rather than suffer in silence. Secondly,the relationship will change in one of two ways. One, the person will listen to you and respect your need and the relationship will improve. Second, the person may ignore you and continue to treat you badly. In that case, you can shift from giving voice to getting distance in the relationship. You can spend less time with the person, limit your contact, or as a last resort, end the relationship completely. Either way, if you change, the relationship changes.
Staying with the topic of personal responsibility, I have had patients tell me, "What good is it if I have to ask for it?" They seem to be saying that the need to ask means that the other person has not been listening and not anticipating their needs. They feel that their partner should know already what they want or need. They react with surprise when I tell them that I think that is unhealthy for two reasons. For one, I explain that the assumption that their partner doesn't care is not reasonable and there are other explanations for their not knowing what is needed. They could forget, be distracted, confused or lost in their own emotional distress. There has to be room for other's mistakes and weaknesses. The assumption that "they should know" makes no allowances for this humanity. The person must be a perfect person who correctly anticipates all needs at all times.
The second reason that this position is unhealthy is because the person has surrendered their personal power to ask and transferred the responsibility for their own well-being to the other. It is a powerless position where your ability to get what you need is based solely on the other person's ability to predict, rather than on your own responsibility to ask. Both the requirement of perfection and the loss of personal power are reasons to make sure that you always ask for what you want and not wait for others to figure it out.
There is one point to this phrase that does seem reasonable. If the person has to ask over and over again for the same thing, then there is a problem with nurturing in the relationship. One person is truly getting ignored and this is as unhealthy as not speaking up when you have needs. If the pattern exists, there is an answer to the question, "What good is it if I have to ask for it?" The answer is to challenge the relationship and be prepared to end it if the pattern continues. If you can't fix the problem, you can at least stop the damage.
Staying with the topic of personal responsibility, I have had patients tell me, "What good is it if I have to ask for it?" They seem to be saying that the need to ask means that the other person has not been listening and not anticipating their needs. They feel that their partner should know already what they want or need. They react with surprise when I tell them that I think that is unhealthy for two reasons. For one, I explain that the assumption that their partner doesn't care is not reasonable and there are other explanations for their not knowing what is needed. They could forget, be distracted, confused or lost in their own emotional distress. There has to be room for other's mistakes and weaknesses. The assumption that "they should know" makes no allowances for this humanity. The person must be a perfect person who correctly anticipates all needs at all times.
The second reason that this position is unhealthy is because the person has surrendered their personal power to ask and transferred the responsibility for their own well-being to the other. It is a powerless position where your ability to get what you need is based solely on the other person's ability to predict, rather than on your own responsibility to ask. Both the requirement of perfection and the loss of personal power are reasons to make sure that you always ask for what you want and not wait for others to figure it out.
There is one point to this phrase that does seem reasonable. If the person has to ask over and over again for the same thing, then there is a problem with nurturing in the relationship. One person is truly getting ignored and this is as unhealthy as not speaking up when you have needs. If the pattern exists, there is an answer to the question, "What good is it if I have to ask for it?" The answer is to challenge the relationship and be prepared to end it if the pattern continues. If you can't fix the problem, you can at least stop the damage.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)